Jun 21, 2018
0 0

World Cup 2018: VAR helps match attain 10 penalties – so is it working?

Written by

World Cup 2018: VAR helps match attain 10 penalties – so is it working?

Harry Kane (second proper) scored twice for England of their Group G victory in opposition to Tunisia but additionally appealed for 2 penalties

A “fairer World Cup”, higher participant behaviour and a discount within the “mobbing” of officers.

The introduction of video assistant referees was one of many main points heading into this World Cup and, as anticipated, it has been a close to fixed speaking level through the first spherical of video games.

4 penalties have been given utilizing VAR, whereas England and Brazil each had trigger to be sad with the system.

Prefer it or not, it’s definitely having an affect – 10 penalties have been awarded in 17 matches. The World Cup document is 18 for a whole match.

Former Premier League referee Mark Halsey instructed BBC Radio 5 dwell the failure of VAR to present spot-kicks to England for fouls on Harry Kane against Tunisia confirmed the system is “inconsistent” and “shouldn’t be on this match”.

However Fifa says it’s “extraordinarily glad with the extent of refereeing to this point and the profitable implementation of the VAR system”.

And David Elleray, technical director of the Worldwide Soccer Affiliation Board – the physique which oversees the legal guidelines of the sport, instructed BBC Sport its total affect has been “very optimistic”.

“There have solely been 5 critiques within the first 17 matches, which conforms to the worldwide common of 1 in each three video games,” stated Elleray, who helps to coach referees in the usage of VAR.

“That is ‘minimal interference’ and with the end result of three matches being immediately affected by the VAR intervention that is ‘most profit’ and a fairer World Cup.

“The behaviour of gamers has been wonderful, with just one crimson card and a low common of yellow playing cards and little mobbing of referees.”

Right here, we check out the incidents thus far and get Elleray’s verdict on whether or not VAR labored in every case.

‘Farce’ as England face Tunisia

‘You want wrestling?’ Pundits analyse Harry Kane penalty appeals

What occurred?

The primary incident within the Group G sport in Volgograd got here within the 39th minute. Ferjani Sassi, who had scored a debatable penalty 4 minutes earlier for Tunisia, appeared to seize Kane within the penalty space and wrestle him to the ground from an England free-kick.

The video assistant referee, Sandro Ricci of Brazil, did provoke a evaluate however no penalty was awarded.

The second incident, at an England nook within the 52nd minute, appeared to point out Kane being pulled to the ground by Yassine Meriah. Once more the choice was checked, once more the identical end result.

What did they are saying?

England striker Harry Kane: “That’s what VAR is there for. At just a few corners I could not transfer.”

Former England striker Alan Shearer on BBC One: “Kane wasn’t allowed to go anyplace as a result of he was being held. I might love someone in control of VAR to elucidate why the holds on Kane within the penalty space did not lead to fouls.”

Ex-England midfielder Frank Lampard on BBC One: “Incidents like these are one of many main causes for VAR. They have been completely deliberate, they usually have been so cynical, however they obtained missed.”

So was it the best resolution?

David Elleray: “The incident within the first half is extra blatant than within the second half. Fifa stated referees can be sturdy on clear holding within the penalty space, so it’s not clear why the VAR didn’t advocate an on-field evaluate, until he felt that there have been additionally offences by different England gamers.”

Griezmann makes historical past

Historical past made as France rating World Cup’s first VAR aim

What occurred?

Within the 54th minute of France’s Group C sport in opposition to Australia in Kazan, France ahead Antoine Griezmann was challenged by Josh Risdon. Referee Andres Cunha waved play on however, after play continued for about 20 seconds, he stopped the sport and headed to the evaluate display screen by the dugouts, earlier than awarding the penalty.

Griezmann transformed to set France on their technique to a win.

What did they are saying?

BBC One co-commentator Mark Lawrenson: “The defender makes the slightest of touches on the ball first. Whether or not he makes contact afterwards is irrelevant – you are all the time going to comply with by way of. Not for me, I am afraid. Sorry. I feel they obtained it fallacious.”

BBC One pundit and England girls boss Phil Neville: “I do not like VAR, I have not executed from day one. I nonetheless suppose I am proper and it isn’t a penalty. It needs to be clear and apparent. Now we have three completely different opinions within the studio so it isn’t clear.”

Former England worldwide Jermaine Jenas on BBC One: “That’s one which should not even be despatched for a evaluate. The referee made his resolution by not giving the penalty. It was not a transparent and apparent mistake. That is the place VAR can come off on the fallacious aspect of issues.”

So was it the best resolution?

Elleray: “The preliminary problem by the Australia defender appears to be like honest however shut examination reveals that the defender then lifts his leg to journey Griezmann. That is one thing the referee didn’t see and thus he made a transparent error in not awarding a penalty kick. Right VAR intervention.”

Brazil search solutions

Zuber heads Switzerland stage in opposition to Brazil

What occurred?

Brazil have been main their Group E opener with Switzerland after they felt defender Miranda was pushed as Steven Zuber headed in a 50th-minute equaliser.

The Brazilians additionally felt Gabriel Jesus was manhandled contained in the Switzerland penalty space later within the second half, however neither incident seemed to be reviewed by VAR.

What did they are saying?

The Brazilian Soccer Confederation (CBF): “The CBF requires to know from Fifa the rationale the expertise was not utilized in key incidents through the sport.”

Brazil coach Tite: “I am simply going to say this as soon as: the Miranda second was very clear. It is a very clear play, it is very, very clear.”

Switzerland coach Vladimir Petkovic: “Now we have the VAR and the VAR ought to present solutions. I simply regarded briefly at our aim – it was a daily aim, that was a daily duel. It wasn’t a foul.”

So was it the best resolution?

Elleray: “Brazilian anger is retrospective; there isn’t a speedy response from the Brazilian defenders when the aim is scored. There’s all the time some pushing and shoving within the penalty space and the referee’s resolution to not penalise the attacker will not be a transparent and apparent error.”

‘That is how VAR must be used’

What occurred?

Cueva fires over the bar after Peru awarded penalty by VAR

With the Group C sport between Peru and Denmark goalless within the 44th minute in Saransk, Christian Cueva went down within the space underneath a problem from Yussuf Poulsen.

Referee Bakary Gassama waved play on however, once more, after play continued for about 23 seconds, the official blew his whistle and stopped play to seek the advice of the evaluate display screen.

A penalty was awarded to Peru, however Cueva could not money in, capturing over.

What did they are saying?

BBC One co-commentator Kevin Kilbane: “It was a very good resolution [to review] from the referee, who did all the things proper. He did not need to make a hasty resolution. It is a clear penalty.”

Former England defender Rio Ferdinand on BBC One: “Unbelievable, that is how VAR must be used. It was a scenario which was a gray space, you possibly can go to evaluate it, see it, and it is clear.”

Chelsea and Spain midfielder Cesc Fabregas on BBC One: “It was a transparent penalty. I agree 100% that VAR have to be used on this manner.”

So was it the best resolution?

Elleray: “This can be a clear referee error and the VAR intervention permits equity to prevail and the proper resolution to be given, which immediately affected the ultimate consequence. VAR at its finest.”

South Korea agree with Sweden VAR penalty

Sweden’s Granqvist scores penalty after VAR evaluate

What occurred?

Sweden’s Group F sport with South Korea seemed to be drifting in direction of a goalless attract Nizhny Novgorod when Viktor Claesson fell underneath a Kim Min-woo problem within the Korean penalty space within the 65th minute.

Referee Joel Aguilar initially allowed play to go however referred to as a halt moments later. He regarded on the incident once more on the pitch-side display screen and about 90 seconds later Andreas Granqvist scored the penalty that was awarded.

What did they are saying?

Sweden coach Janne Andersson: “I felt the watch for the VAR was pointless. There was little question the penalty ought to have been referred to as straightaway. Fortunately the referee had VAR to assist him to have the ability to make the best resolution.”

South Korea coach Shin Tae-yong: “Lets say it was regrettable however he was tackled between his legs. We do agree that it was a very good name.”

Former Liverpool defender Stephen Warnock on BBC Radio 5 dwell: “My first response was no penalty, it regarded like he obtained simply sufficient on the ball, nevertheless it’s the striker’s contact. VAR makes the best resolution.”

So was it the best resolution?

Elleray: “This can be a very clear missed penalty and it’s considerably stunning that the referee made such a transparent error. This incident reveals how VAR has introduced larger equity to the World Cup as this penalty immediately affected the results of the match.”

Salah introduced down in field says VAR

Salah blasts dwelling VAR penalty

What occurred?

In Monday’s Group A match between Egypt and Russia, Mohamed Salah was held by Roman Zobnin when working into the world. The holding started exterior however continued into the 18-yard field. Initially referee Enrique Caceres gave a free-kick however VAR deemed the infringement was contained in the field.

What did they are saying?

Match of the Day pundit Danny Murphy stated the foul “was a penalty”, and colleague Alan Shearer stated it was “the proper resolution”.

So was it the best resolution?

Elleray: “The legal guidelines of the sport clearly state that if holding begins exterior the penalty space and continues into the penalty space it’s a penalty kick. This was a very good instance of the VAR helping the referee to make the proper resolution.”

BBC Sport – Football

Article Categories:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *